Don't worry Gerry, we still love you (well, I don't, but the Rangers sure seem to)

Anybody remember earlier this spring? When Gerald Laird was whining about how he shouldn't have to compete with Jarrod Saltalamacchia for the catching job?

Well, it looks like Gerald needn't have worried. The Rangers are now loudly trumpeting that he will indeed be their opening day catcher, over the young offensive phenom Jarrod Saltalamacchia.

Laird, 28, is coming off the worst offensive season of his career last year, when he hit .224/.278/.349, and posted an OPS of 627. This came after his best offensive season in 2006, in which he hit .296/.332/.473 and posted an 805 OPS, platooning with Rod Barajas. Those numbers, however, where largely skewed by the fact that he hit .400/.414/.600 against left-handers - an impressive line to be sure, but his .241/.291/.405 line against righties that year was far more indicitive of what Gerald's limits are.

He's a career .221/.277/.339 hitter against right-handed pitching with a 616 OPS. He may be able to mash the lefties (.307/.348/.467 career, 815 OPS)but unless he has a platoon partner to protect him against the right-handers (like Barajas in '06) offensive years like 2007 are going to be a recurring theme for Gerald.

The Rangers, however, despite the fact that they now have one of their weakest offensive clubs in years, don't seem to care. Instead, they sing the praises of his defense, and his 40.2% success rate at throwing out baserunners:

"He's got a great arm, quick release, and athleticism behind the plate" says former Major League catcher and now third base coach Matt Walbeck. He's able to pick up balls, make sidearm throws, throw behind the runner - stuff you can't teach."

That's great. No, seriously, that is. Gerald is a fine defensive catcher. But the Rangers seem to be forgetting what's at stake here - and it's a heckuva lot more important that Gerald Laird's throwing abilities. It's called development. The Rangers have a farm system loaded to the gills with catching prospects (Mike Hindman can tell you all about that better than I can) - plus Jarrod Saltalamacchia, the offensively lauded, but defensively decried catcher accquired in the Mark Teixeira trade last year.

Salty 's bat is defintely projected to be elite among catchers - Baseball America ranked him as the Braves top prospect in 2007 and the second-best in 2006, while ranking him as the organization's best hitter for average in both years. In his time in the big leagues last year, he hit .266/.310/.422, with 11 HR and 33 RBI, stats that probably would have been much better if he hadn't been made to play the unfamiliar position of first base by the Rangers, where he hit a miserable .203/.236/.346 at, while also commiting 10 errors (in 38 games). When playing as a backstop, however, Salty flashed his offensive potential, ripping .325/.373/.503. Taking that into consideration, one would only expect a player of his talent to improve those overall numbers this time around, if allowed to remain behind the plate.

But that's what Texas needs to find out: will Saltalamacchia's bat and be enough to keep him behind the plate at the major league level? Within a year or so, Taylor Teagarden, who could turn out to be a fine offensive catcher in his own right, with better defensive capabilites than Saltalamacchia, should be knocking at Arlington's doorstep. That means now is the time for the Rangers to let Salty get consistent, full time at-bats behind the plate, at the Major League level, and evaluate whether or not his offense will be enough to outweigh any defensive shortcomings. He's never going to be the strongest defender wherever he plays, although his defense should become servicable in time - but it's his bat that needs to be evaluated, and allowed to develop on the Major League level. Offensively, he's already proven he can hold his own with the big boys - now the Rangers need to find out if he's good enough to carve himself a niche.

Because come 2009, there's going to be another battle behind the plate in Texas - one that won't involve a certain 28 year-old catcher who is all but expendable to the organization in the grand scheme of things. It'll be the two young catchers, Salty and Teagarden, slugging it out for playing time - and Texas is going to have a decision to make. One will have to move to make room for the other - and with the Rangers now commited to developing the powerful Chris Davis as their future at first base, that could mean that one will be departing the organization. But the Rangers aren't making that decision any easier on themselves by insisting that they somehow "need" Gerald Laird and his throwing arm.

With his offensive limitations, Laird is on the fast track to nowhere - especially considering the depth the Rangers have behind him. But why the front office continues to cling to this guy like he's some kind of key defensive catylist in their plans is beyond me. They should be entertaining the offers they are getting from other teams right now, not rebuffing them. Because sooner or later, the Rangers are going to have to break down, and throw Laird aside for the younger player, be it Teagarden or Salty. Why not do it now, and allow Salty to get a jump on his development? A move like that would not only be the better path for Salty, but for the organization - so what's the holdup? Oh wait, that's right - the throwing arm. Gotcha.

5 Comments

When you value a player more than the market does, you get to keep him. Why in this case? I don't know, either.


Who would have thought that RW would be singing the praises of Gerald this Spring? Not me after last season. The reality appears to me that RW the 'baseball man' would rather not have to put up with rookies and their mistakes.

On a team which should be rebuilding, on a team where youth is acknowledged as needed for the success of the team - I am very interested to see how many rookies actually make the team. Will any? Botts or Cruz? It's still too early to tell for sure, but Salty may be the best (and only) chance for a rookie on the 25! Truly amazing.

I'll give the team some more time this spring, but early returns don't look very promising to me.

Great recap of the catching situation, Jon.


I'm not certain that Teagarden will be ready just a year from now (after all, he has notched just 102 AB at Frisco - along with an unsustainable .418 BABIP), but the Rangers really aren't finding out much about their future by allowing Laird to remain installed at the backstop position on a full-time basis.

Brian - you make a great point about Ron Wash - that's something I've always said myself, that Ron doesn't like to play his young players. And for that reason, should probably not be managing the team. I am planning to put together a peice on the Rangers younger players in camp this spring - perhaps today, we'll see - but from what I've recently heard, neither Botts nor Cruz are looking like they'll make the team.


Joey - Another point I didn't bring up in the article is if Salty has to play in AAA full time, it's also going to throw a wrench into Teagarden's development, and possibly set him back a year or so, as he needs to be getting those full-time AB's in AAA himself.

In any case, opening day 2009 might be a bit optimistic for Tea, but he'll probably be ready for a callup sometime that season - upon which he will start vying with Salty for playing time.

Washington is trying to save his job. Daniels just got an extension and will cut Washingtons throat if he starts out slow. So either extend Ronald which i am totally against or fire him. Walbeck is evidenty the manager in waiting. Why aren't we developing managers and coaches in the minor leagues that can help us at the major league level in the future?

Hey jon if you are in Southern California, how about the Padres, Angels or Dodgers? I like to support my local teams too, but adapt to your environment and cheer on a winner. Not all of us can afford to live out there, but my wife was born in Indio, California in 1968, near the Salton Sea in Riverside County.

Leave a comment